How valuable are environmental health interventions? : evaluation of water and sanitation programmes in India

Researchers have used an improved evaluation method to better calculate economic benefits of a rural water supply and sanitation programme in India. This was achieved by getting comprehensive pre-intervention baseline data from treatment and control villages, and including the costs of medical bills, lost income and and water treatment.

Pattanayak, S.K … [et al] (2010). How valuable are environmental health interventions? : evaluation of water and sanitation programmes in India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization ; vol. 88, no. p. 535-542. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.066050

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and quantify the economic benefits attributable to improvements in water supply and sanitation in rural India.

Methods

We combined propensity-score “pre-matching” and rich pre–post panel data on 9500 households in 242 villages located in four geographically different districts to estimate the economic benefits of a large-scale community demand-driven water supply programme in Maharashtra, India. We calculated coping costs and cost of illness by adding across several elements of coping and illness and then estimated causal impacts using a difference-in-difference strategy on the pre-matched sample. The pre–post design allowed us to use a difference-in-difference estimator to measure “treatment effect” by comparing treatment and control villages during both periods. We compared average household costs with respect to out-of-pocket medical expenses, patients’ lost income, caregiving costs, time spent on collecting water, time spent on sanitation, and water treatment costs due to filtration, boiling, chemical use and storage.

Findings

Three years after programme initiation, the number of households using piped water and private pit latrines had increased by 10% on average, but no changes in hygiene-related behaviour had occurred. The behavioural changes observed suggest that the average household in a programme community could save as much as 7 United States dollars per month (or 5% of monthly household cash expenditures) in coping costs, but would not reduce illness costs. Poorer, socially marginalized households benefited more, in alignment with programme objectives.

Conclusion

Given the renewed interest in water, sanitation and hygiene outcomes, evaluating the economic benefits of environmental interventions by means of causal research is important for understanding the true value of such interventions.

For more on WASH evaluation see:

Garandeau, R., Casella D. and Bostoen, K. (2009). Evaluating & improving the WASH sector : strengthening WASH governance, learning about complexity, assessing change. (Thematic overview paper series ; 23). The Hague, The Netherlands, IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre. Download here

Contact: Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, Duke University, USA, e-mail: subhrendu.pattanayak@duke.edu

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s