WSUP is seeking an experienced consultant to conduct a rigorous end-of-programme evaluation. WSUP’s DFID-funded programme runs from December 2012 – March 2016 and targets the adoption and replication of effective urban water, sanitation and hygiene models by WASH service providers, national governments and international financing institutions across the six countries where WSUP has an established presence (Bangladesh, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Mozambique and Zambia). It is further characterised by a comprehensive programme of research, publications and communications aimed at informing and influencing the international WASH sector. Strong knowledge of methodologies for programme evaluation and experience of evaluating capacity development and institutional influencing interventions are essential. Interested evaluators are encouraged to review the attached terms of reference and submit their proposal to firstname.lastname@example.org by 12th November 2015.
What sanitation topics you are interested in?
- Re: studies on MHM and schoolgirls' health and schooling - by: JenniferRubli December 7, 2016Hello Penny and others, This is such a great discussion happening here! The issue of deliberate absenteeism is interesting and very important, especially as, as has been mentioned in this thread, in the virtual MHM conference, and in several recent studies, absenteeism does not seem to be a valid indicator; an RCT in Nepal (Oster & Thornton, 2010) showed […]
- Re: studies on MHM and schoolgirls' health and schooling - by: Camilla December 7, 2016Dear Penny, I appreciate your elaborate answer. Thank you. We also encounter similar difficulties in regards to attendance. In complete agreement regarding doing research focusing on "self-efficacy, self-esteem, dignity, well-being, ability to concentrate in class". When I worked with Peepoople we did a nice SROI study. I like that methodology. Wha […]
- Re: studies on MHM and schoolgirls' health and schooling - by: PennyPH December 7, 2016Dear Camilla Many thanks for your interest and response. Regarding the question - why has the cup not shown clear evidence of a reduction in absence is an important observation. we concluded we did not have adequate reporting on absence in any of the groups to analyse the effect. We try to address the absence question in our 'discussion' section - […]
- Re: How can companies incentivise sanitation - by: magdalenabauer December 7, 2016Dear Sandhya, the points you mentioned sound plausible. I have 2 questions concerning your comment. 1. Can you elaborate a bit more on the volunteering program you mentioned first? Any concrete example? Do you have any stories from partners? As Sujoy pointed out, we all would really be interested on corporate view and their motivation. 2. Do you think microf […]
- Re: Sanitation for the Homeless in the US - by: markllo December 7, 2016I've been spending 2-3 hours a week in one of the local encampments in Seattle. I have 5 toilets deployed, and thought they are being used and they are fairly simple units people still have problems operating them. I've found that homeless camps have unique challenges. Village type solutions where there is any training at all are not feasible. If y […]
- Re: studies on MHM and schoolgirls' health and schooling - by: JenniferRubli December 7, 2016
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Add to favourites